Artwork

Cecilia, Lady Killigrew

Cecilia, Lady Killigrew, by Robert Gaywood, 1690
Cecilia, Lady Killigrew, by Robert Gaywood, 1690

Cecilia, Lady Killigrew is a print by Robert Gaywood. It dates from 1690 and is held in the collection of the Cleveland Museum of Art.

About this work

Overview

Cecilia, Lady Killigrew is a late 17th-century portrait print by Robert Gaywood, dating to around 1690, and is part of the collection at The Cleveland Museum of Art.

Subject & Meaning

The portrait depicts Cecilia, Lady Killigrew, in a state of serene composure. Her attire—a fancy dress with ruffles—and accessories, including a pearl necklace and a meticulously rendered bouquet of flowers, signify her wealthy status. The flowers, detailed to the point of appearing almost independent, further emphasize her high social standing.

Technique & Style

The print utilizes strong contrasts of light and shadow, characteristic of chiaroscuro, to create depth. The plain background ensures the subject remains the focal point. The meticulous drawing of the bouquet highlights the artist's attention to detail, reflecting a common stylistic choice in portraits of affluent women during this period.

History & Provenance

Created circa 1690 by Robert Gaywood, the work's provenance prior to its acquisition by The Cleveland Museum of Art is not detailed here.

Context

This portrait reflects the societal norms of its time, where the depiction of luxury items and meticulous details in a subject's attire and accessories was used to convey wealth and status.

Legacy

While specific influences or impacts of 'Cecilia, Lady Killigrew' on subsequent art are not highlighted in the provided information, it remains a representative example of late 17th-century portrait printmaking, illustrating the use of chiaroscuro and the depiction of wealth in art.

Artist & collection

Artist

Robert Gaywood

Robert Gaywood (1650–1711) was a British artist.

This work is in the public domain (CC0). Image source: Cleveland Museum of Art open access. Spotted an error in this record? Tell us.