Artwork

The daughter-in-law returns from her misadventure, feigning insanity, from a Tuti-nama (Tales of a Parrot): Sixteenth Night

The daughter-in-law returns from her misadventure, feigning insanity, from a Tuti-nama (Tales of a Parrot): Sixteenth Night, by Unknown, unspecified, 1560
The daughter-in-law returns from her misadventure, feigning insanity, from a Tuti-nama (Tales of a Parrot): Sixteenth Night, by Unknown, unspecified, 1560

The daughter-in-law returns from her misadventure, feigning insanity, from a Tuti-nama (Tales of a Parrot): Sixteenth Night is an unspecified painting by the Mughal Painting artist Unknown. It dates from 1560 and is held in the collection of the Cleveland Museum of Art.

About this work

The artist shows her acting crazy, but the real drama is in the faces of the people watching.

A woman with wild hair and torn clothes kneels before a king. She’s barefoot, no jewelry, pretending to be mad. The king sits on a carpet, watching. Above them, women peek from a balcony, shocked.

This painting tells a story from a 16th-century Indian book called the *Tuti-nama*. The woman is lying—she ran off with a lover and now has to hide it. The artist shows her acting crazy, but the real drama is in the faces of the people watching.

To see more paintings like this, look up Mughal India, court of Akbar (reigned 1556–1605).

Overview

This painting illustrates a scene from the sixteenth-century Persianate text known as the Tuti-nama, a collection of moral fables framed by a parrot’s stories. Created during the reign of Emperor Akbar, it depicts a royal daughter-in-law’s return to her husband’s court after an unauthorized absence. Her disheveled appearance and barefoot state are part of a calculated performance to conceal her true actions, setting the stage for a quiet drama of deception and observation.

Subject & Meaning

The woman, having fled with a lover, feigns madness to avoid punishment. Her unkempt hair, torn garments, and absence of adornment serve as visible signs of her claimed mental state. The king, seated calmly with an attendant, observes her without immediate reaction, suggesting suspicion or restraint. Above, women peer from a balcony, their expressions revealing shock and curiosity, underscoring the tension between public performance and private truth.

Technique & Style

Executed in the Mughal court painting tradition, the work employs fine brushwork, delicate color gradations, and precise detailing of textiles and architecture. The composition is divided horizontally: the lower plane holds the central interaction, while the upper gallery introduces a secondary layer of witnesses. Spatial depth is suggested through architectural framing, and emotional nuance is conveyed through subtle facial expressions rather than exaggerated gestures.

History & Provenance

The painting originates from a manuscript commissioned under Emperor Akbar’s patronage, likely produced in the imperial atelier between 1560 and 1580. Such illustrated Tuti-nama manuscripts were created to entertain and instruct the court, blending Persian literary traditions with Indian artistic sensibilities. This particular folio was part of a larger series, now dispersed across global collections, reflecting the mobility of Mughal artistic projects during the late sixteenth century.

Context

The Tuti-nama was adapted from earlier Arabic and Persian sources and reimagined for Akbar’s court as a vehicle for ethical storytelling. These tales often explored themes of loyalty, deception, and social order—subjects relevant to courtly life. The depiction of a noblewoman’s transgression and its concealment reflects contemporary anxieties about gender, status, and the performance of propriety within the royal household.

Legacy

This painting exemplifies the Mughal court’s investment in narrative illustration as a tool for moral and political reflection. Its nuanced portrayal of psychological subtlety influenced later Indian miniature traditions. Though the Tuti-nama manuscripts are less widely known than other Mughal works, they remain vital for understanding how storytelling, visual culture, and imperial ideology converged in sixteenth-century India.

Artist & collection

Artist

Unknown

entity whose identity is not known

This work is in the public domain (CC0). Image source: Cleveland Museum of Art open access. Spotted an error in this record? Tell us.